As the editor of Housing Association Magazine, I find myself reflecting on Labour's recent pronouncements on housing policy with a mixture of optimism, scepticism, and curiosity.
Labour has indicated that addressing the housing crisis will be a central pillar of their platform, and this focus is much needed.
But the question that looms large for many in the sector is: will Labour's housing strategy include a revival of council housing.
And if so, what will that mean for Housing Associations (HAs)?
This raises concerns about the continuity and sustainability of HA’s work.
A council housing revival?
The housing crisis in the UK has reached an acute level. Decades of underinvestment, coupled with rising demand, have left millions without access to affordable, secure housing. Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor, has spoken at length about Labour’s intent to increase housing supply and address affordability.
But details on how Labour plans to achieve this are still emerging.
One of the key components of this discussion is the potential revival of council housing. Historically, council housing was the backbone of affordable housing in the UK, providing secure homes for millions.
However, the right-to-buy scheme introduced in the 1980s and subsequent lack of investment has led to a severe decline in the availability of council housing stock. The prospect of Labour reinvigorating this sector is tantalizing, but it also raises several critical questions.
Collaboration or competition?
If Labour commits to a significant expansion of council housing, the next question is how this will intersect with the work of Housing Associations.
Over the past few decades, HAs have taken up the mantle of providing affordable housing, often stepping in where councils no longer could. They have developed expertise, built new homes, and supported tenants in ways that councils, with their diminished resources and capacities, have struggled to match.
One possible scenario is that Labour’s housing policy could see council housing and Housing Associations working in tandem. In this model, councils could be empowered to build and manage homes directly, while also collaborating with HAs to ensure a broader range of affordable housing options.
This partnership approach could leverage the strengths of both sectors: councils’ direct connection to local communities and HAs’ expertise in managing and developing housing.
However, there’s also a risk that a renewed focus on council housing could sideline Housing Associations, especially if funding and resources are redirected towards local authorities.
For those of us in the sector, this raises concerns about the continuity and sustainability of the housing associations' work.
Do councils still have the expertise?
One of the significant challenges facing a potential revival of council housing is the question of whether local councils still have the expertise, resources, and capacity to manage and develop large-scale housing projects.
The reality is that many councils have seen their housing departments hollowed out over the years due to austerity measures and the shift in focus towards outsourcing and partnerships with Housing Associations.
Rebuilding this capacity will not be easy or quick. It would require substantial investment not just in housing itself, but in the training and development of council staff, the establishment of new housing departments, and the creation of new governance structures.
Labour would need to be realistic about the time and resources required to achieve this, and whether it is more efficient to work through established HAs who already have the necessary expertise.
What does a dream housing policy look like?
So, what would an ideal housing policy look like? In my view, it must be ambitious, inclusive, and pragmatic. Here’s what I believe should be the key components:
Significant investment in social housing: Whether through councils, Housing Associations, or a combination of both, there must be a large-scale investment in building new social housing.
This should include not just new builds, but also the renovation and repurposing of existing buildings.
Partnership approach: Rather than choosing between councils and HAs, Labour’s policy should foster partnerships that leverage the strengths of both.
This could include joint ventures, shared resources, and coordinated planning efforts.
Focus on affordability and security: Any new housing policy must prioritize affordability and security for tenants.
This means not just capping rents, but also ensuring that new housing developments are designed with long-term sustainability in mind.
Capacity building for councils: If councils are to play a central role in housing once again, there must be a parallel investment in their capacity to deliver.
This means training, funding, and the creation of new housing departments where necessary.
Environmental and social considerations: The housing crisis must be addressed with a view to sustainability and social equity.
New developments should be environmentally friendly, and policies should ensure that vulnerable and marginalized groups have access to safe and secure housing.
In summary
Labour’s focus on housing is a welcome development in a political landscape that has too often neglected this critical issue. But the path forward is not without its challenges.
Whether Labour will choose to revive council housing, how this will impact Housing Associations, and whether councils are ready for such a responsibility are all questions that require careful consideration.
As the housing crisis deepens, it is crucial that all stakeholders—councils, HAs, the government, and the private sector—come together to develop a holistic, ambitious, and practical housing policy.
Only through collaboration and shared vision can we hope to build the homes that the UK so desperately needs.
Joe Bradbury is digital editor of Housing Association magazine